We are a small firm that offers legal services at a high level of skill and sophistication.

We attempt to resolve business disputes in a practical and sensible manner.

We will help you articulate and vigorously pursue a realistic business and litigation objective.

We work efficiently and cost effectively and avoid needless duplication of effort.

Business & Commercial Litigation

Business & Commercial Litigation

Intellectual Property Litigation


Representation of Employees & Employers

Representation of Employees & Employers

Icon Phonecontact us today212-697-2715
Email Us
[et_pb_stop_stacking _builder_version=”3.29.3″ disabled_on=”on|on|on” disabled=”on” _i=”1″ _address=”″ /]

Maps and Direction

banner mobile

Restrictive covenants: which employees can be required to sign?

On Behalf of | Oct 22, 2014 | Uncategorized |

Trademarks and copyrights help protect valuable and publicly-known intellectual property for businesses. There is another type of asset that is vital to the success of any business enterprise. We are talking about trade secrets. This can refer to any confidential business information from client contact lists to training procedures for its talent. It accounts for basically anything that could give them a competitive edge.

Unlike trademarks or copyrights, the value of trade secrests for the company lies in keeping these secrets well… secret. How does one accomplish that without publishing the information that the business wants to protect? The answer is through restrictive covenants such as a confidentiality or non-compete agreement with employees.

Covenants that either restrict or limit an individual’s employment opportunities are highly scrutinized by courts. The reality is that these agreements are signed at the beginning of an employment relationship. They don’t come under the purview of the court until the relationship changes and either the employer wants to enforce the clause or an employee wants to declare that it is unenforceable.

Nationwide sandwich giant Jimmy John’s recently came under fire for a non-compete clause that is allegedly on the far side of too restrictive. The clause applies to low-wage employees and restricts them from working for a competing sandwich company for at least two years.

Can these agreements cover low-wage workers and not just executive or specialized talent? Where should the line be drawn? The fact that there isn’t an absolutely clear standard is exactly what opens the door for disputes. If you represent a business that needs to protect its interests with a restrictive covenant, it is vital that you take care in selecting an attorney to represent you in any contract dispute.

Source: 12 News, “Jimmy John’s under fire for worker contracts,” Ben Rooney, Oct. 22, 2014

Brand Side

Arthur R. Lehman, L.L.C.
60 East 42nd Street
Suite 4600
New York, NY 10165

Phone: 212-697-2715
Fax: 646-390-6497
New York Law Office Map

FindLaw Network